ABSTRACT
Objective@#To retrospectively analyze the diagnosis time, pathogen distribution, and drug resistance of fungal bloodstream infection in severe burn patients.@*Methods@#Blood samples were collected from 55 severe burn patients with fungal bloodstream infection (including 46 males and 9 females, aged 42 (1, 78) years) admitted to the intensive care unit of the Institute of Burn Research of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University) from July 2011 to May 2019 for retrospective analysis. Microbial monitoring system was used to cultivate pathogens, API yeast identification kit and Candida chromogenic medium were used to identify pathogens, and Kirby-Bauer paper disk diffusion method was used to detect drug resistance of fungi to fluconazole, amphotericin B, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and voriconazole. The positive rate of blood fungal culture, mortality rate, distribution of local fungal proliferation sites, the diagnosis time distribution of fungal bloodstream infection, the distribution of fungal species, resistance to commonly-used antifungal drugs, and the use of antibiotics were assessed. The WHONET 5.6 software was applied to analyze the distribution and drug resistance of fungi.@*Results@#(1) Totally 4 839 blood samples were collected during the 9 years, and 122 strains of fungi were isolated, with positive rate of 2.52%. The mortality rate was 14.55% (8 patients) in 55 patients. Catheter fungal proliferation ranked the first among 30 cases of local fungal proliferation. (2) The diagnosis time of fungal bloodstream infection mainly distributed in ≤1 week of hospitalization [32.73% (18/55)]. (3) Among the 55 strains of fungi detected, the detection rate of Candida parapsilosis ranked the first (21.82%, 12 strains), Candida glabrata was the second (18.18%, 10 strains), and Candida tropicalis was tied with Candida albicans in the third place (14.55%, 8 strains). All the detected fungi were sensitive to amphotericin B, and the resistance rates to voriconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole were between 4.5% and 9.1%. (4) Droad-spectrum antibiotics were used in all the 55 patients, ≥3 kinds of antibiotics were used in 44 patients, and 37 patients used antibacterial drugs ≥7 days.@*Conclusions@#The diagnosis time of fungal bloodstream infection in the 55 severe burn patients was mainly within 1 week of hospitalization. Candida parapsilosis is the most commonly detected fungal species. Catheter fungal proliferation occurs most commonly among the 30 patients with local fungal proliferation. All the detected fungi were sensitive to amphotericin B, with low drug resistance to voriconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were overused in the severe burn patients with fungal bloodstream infection.
ABSTRACT
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) refers to a venous reflux disorder caused by abnormal condensation of blood in deep veins,It is detected in cardinal veins of the whole body and often occurred in the lower extremities.Desquamation of thrombus may cause pulmonary embolism (PE).PE and DVT are two clinical manifestations of different stages of the same disease,which are collectively referred to as venous thromboembolism (VTE).Five famous experts in hernia and abdominal wall surgery explored the prevention and treatment of DVT during perioperative period in patients undergoing abdominal wall hernia surgery from different angles based on clinical experiences.Professor Liu Ziwen introduced the epidemiology of DVT during perioperative period in patients undergoing abdominal wall hernia surgery,emphasized its risks,analyzed systematically its mechanisms including slow venous blood flow,vein injury,high blood coagulation state,underlying diseases and specific factors of abdominal wall hernia surgery,focused on mechanisms of inflammation caused by meshes inducing DVT.Professor Zhang Guangyong introduced informatively its diagnosis with clear and careful thinking,from the clinical manifestations to assistant examinations and moreover to Wells quantitative scoring,from general to specific and from qualitative to quantitative,striving to achieve early and precise diagnosis in order to prevent misseddiagnosis or ignoration of its danger level.Professor Li Hangyu emphasized appropriate preventive and treatment measures according to different stages and risk levels by evaluating the risk factors of preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative DVT.Professor Shen Yingmo analyzed special factors of laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia inducing DVT during the perioperative period,and indicated that surgeons should select surgical methods individually after comprehensive evaluation and consideration because of uncertainty of risk degree in laparoscopic and open surgery inducing DVT during perioperative period based on exis-ting evidence-based medicine and related guidelines.Professor Lu Chaoyang introduced three categories of main treatments including anticoagulation therapy,thrombolytic therapy and surgical therapy,and specific drugs,indications,advantages and disadvantages,opportunities,recommended clinicians to select individually and rationally.
ABSTRACT
0.05),but the contraction frequency and kinetic index were both decreased(P0.05).In pancreas transplantation dogs,the basic pressure,contraction frequency and kinetic index were all decreased with usage of ulinastatin(P
ABSTRACT
Objective To summarize our experience in the prevention and treatment of accessory hepatic duct injury during operation on biliary tract.Methods The clinical data of 26 cases with accessory hepatic duct were retrospectively reviewed.Results Of 26 cases,the accessory hepatic duct were type I in 38.5%(10/26),and no complications including bile leakage,biliary infection and obstructive jaundice developed after division and ligation of the accessory hepatic duct;26.9%(7/26) were type II,among which,the accessory hepatic duct were injured in 3 cases,but no case developecl complications after relevant treatment;23.0%(6/26) were type III,among which,injury of accessory bile duct occurred in 2 cases.Of them,1 case developed bile leakage and was cured by reoperation.7.7%(2/26) were type IV and 3.9%(1/26) was type V.The cases of type IV and V were not damaged.Conclusions To prevent injury of accessory hepatic duct,pre-and intra-operation identification of the condition is very important,and especially by intraoperative cholangiography.Different types of accessory hepatic duct injury should be treated by different approaches. Accessory hepatic duct of type I might be cut and ligated.Type II accessory bile duct which(enters) the cystic duct and should be protected,but,if damaged,different methods of treatment are used,(depending) on the caliber of accessory hepatic duct.Type III and IV also should be protected,but,when damaged,the accessory hepatic duct should be repaired or performed an internal draining.